Promoting Health Internationally Essay

growing countries be beset with wellness crises to a greater extent than their more than than actual counterparts. The lack of resources and the presence of numerous demanding unavoidably causes the insufficient allocation of such resources for the addressing of wellness sequels. In other countries, thither is b arly no technology to take the demand bring rounds for the bigger diseases besetting their populations. Whereas in more genuine countries with greater storehouse of resources there is a greater capacity to address health fusss, specially with a more positive technological platform to work from. non unaccompanied this, but ontogenesis countries shake up a marked wane in addressing sanitation concerns and so making for environments more pr sensation to diseases caused by bacteria, worms, and viruses.1 With more healthful living conditions, this is non the ob lookd parapraxis in maturation countries. Thus, a confederacy of non-hygienic conditions an d low access code to healthcare creates atmospheres for developing nations making them more prone to experiencing desolate health problems.The first concern take ining health problems in developing countries is the possibility of a disease to develop which is easily contractable from person to person. The fear of infectious diseases, particularly the fear of such diseases causing a pandemic, has had significant impact on the port in which the spherical conjunction addresses spherical health problems. international agencies shake move up up with surveillance systems to enable part countries to report incidents of infectious diseases and to better agree non- change nations against contamination.2 The mechanism of report requires member nations to delineate the nature and extent of infection of the disease. This is not particularly attractive to infected nations as the reporting of diseases would adversely affect the delivery of the s maintenance rural area. With a fear of infection, remote investors would dishonor their rates of importation. This would serve to lower the economic growth of the s sanction country. non save this, but tourists would be terrific of visiting said foreign country and income from such investments would as well as decline. The stigma against the affected country would translate to a decline in the status of their scrimping. It is in this regard that health issues of item-by-item nations affect the global view on health. The slightest change in the ability of individual countries to provide staple fibre resources or to contribute to the global economy would affect all other countries as a result of global interconnectedness.3 The dependence of nations, one to the other, cannot sustain the devolution of product of goods in any one nation. Apart from moral responsibilities, this is the weightiest argument to a global eyeshot on health promotion. The global market favors the ensuring of wealthier nations that less sufficient nations will be able to introduce fully in the global slyness of goods. What is not considered in this model are non-infectious diseases plaguing the developing countries around the globe. There is poor incentive for global agencies to address such problems since there is no showing that the corresponding would affect citizens of foreign nations. Although the argument for providing aid for the same due to global business considerations still stands, there is pocket-sized to no initiative from private medicine companies. The primary repoint of such companies being profit, they are not drawn by the ejaculate for lower prices ask in developing countries.Thus, the trend remains for drug companies to produce drugs and cures that will react the needs of genuine countries whom they can charge higher prices for the products and operate they offer. Diseases plaguing needy nations such as malaria, AIDS, terabit and the like are given little attention although they may present greater threats than hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. This is an unfortunate as developed nations should take it upon themselves to promote health in developing nations as well.The world(prenominal) community would benefit to a greater extent with the improvement of all fixings nations. The nations in the international community should not only consider giving aid to developing nations when the diseases may spread into their make localities but level(p) so when the diseases may be contained home(prenominal) helpally. The engage then should not be for global regulation of domestic plagues but it should be for international interest in holistic global health. Although drug companies refuse to focus on respondent the needs of the major diseases in impoverished nations this is not to say that no organised action is being undertaken for the same. Certainly there are individuals and groups who recognize the importance of promoting health on a global scale.T he realness Health Organization, for example has collaborated with large pharmaceutic companies in order to bring drugs for the cure of prevalent diseases into levels of access for developing nations.4 The proposed fancy is to decrease drug prices for developing nations, if the bare(a) delivery of the same is not probable, by increasing prices in affluent countries. much(prenominal) a scheme would permit the grant of drugs by developed countries. There would thus be an equitable division of required resources in order to gain access of available cures in the market.There has also been an observed trend in scientific laboratories. Scientists capable of performing research investigating cures for diseases of poverty have sh feature greater purpose for the same. Funding may be an issue in the matter however, more and more charities are focusing on the aim of global health and even domestic governments are supporting the bid for purpose cures for large health issues.Not only thi s, but movements have been make to have pharmaceutical companies share the process of production if the matter of marketing drugs at a no-profit price is not possible. Local governments or corporations could then work on producing their own drugs using the process and information overlap by foreign corporations. These matters are shortly being pushed by advocates worldwide.However, the international community still has much ground to cover. The problem of international health is still a major issue receiving small antecedency in the global scale. The problem of politicking and bureaucratism hinders advances that could be make in this field. Thus, in order to more competently answer the problem, local policies should first be reshaped and made to realize the importance of health in the governmental platform. Furthermore, local governments should not ricochet themselves to addressing only their own separate needs. Garrett aptly captures the issueTactically, all aspects of preventi on and preaching should be part of an integrated effort, outline from countries finite pools of health talent to guarantee all monsters at once, rather than dueling by the piece with individual dragons. 5Given confine resources, in the international sense as well as in the domestic, the pooling of these same resources is the best solution to the problem of both(prenominal) global and local health. The vision of individual nations should be enhanced to not only address their own problems but they should chicken feed to realize the relevance in spend in a global perspective in answering health issues. Certainly, with a view of the same, advances will be made not only for short consideration goals of fending off singular diseases in trustworthy nations but more so the bulky term goal of eradicating debilitating diseases that could potentially reappear in similar conditions or in evolved forms.The answer then is to go under internationally for the problem of global health as the strengthening of individual platforms in individual nations will address the seed issue of recurring conditions. This will serve not only to strengthen the global health system but even other sectors of concern such as trade and global relations as more and more countries invest in programs reflecting amity and gratuity.BIBILIOGRAPHYCheck, Erika,Quest for the Cure, foreign Policy, (2006) 28-36.Garrett, Laurie, The argufy of Global Health, hostile Affairs 86(1), (2007) 14-38.Naim, Moises and Brundtland, Gro Harlem, The FP consultation The Global War for Public Health, Foreign Policy 128, (2002) 24-36.Osterholm, Michael T., Unprepared for a Pandemic, Foreign Affairs 86(2), (2007) 47-57.Zacher, Mark W., Global epidemiologic Surveillance, in Inge Kaw, Isabelle Grunberg, and Marc A. Stern, Global Public Goods International Cooperation in the 21st Century (eds.), (1999), NY UNAP.